The SLF uses the five-level European avalanche danger scale to denote the avalanche danger. The danger level depends on a range of variables, in particular the snowpack stability, i.e. the probability of an avalanche triggering; the prevalence of avalanche prone locations; and potential avalanche size. The probability of an avalanche triggering increases sharply as the danger level rises.

A danger level always applies to one region and cannot reflect the peculiarities of a specific individual slope. In addition, the danger level stated in the Avalanche Bulletin is always a prediction and should be evaluated on-site.

Short version

Also in the case of less typical avalanche situations the danger level is a measure of the order of magnitude of the avalanche danger. These situations are detailed below along with information about their assessment by the avalanche warning service. As these are atypical situations, no list can ever be exhaustive. In atypical situations deviations from the danger level definition are inevitable. These are set out as far as possible in the avalanche bulletin's danger description.

Faceted-crystal snowpack

In the case of low avalanche danger (level 1) the snowpack is normally well bonded and stable. However, after long periods of fine weather with shallow snow, another form of snow occurring in mid-winter which makes slab avalanches virtually impossible is the whole snowpack being loose and transformed into faceted crystals. The snowpack is then very weak and there are also weak layers, but the bonded layer on top (the 'slab') is lacking. With no bonded layer a fracture cannot be propagated, meaning that there is no possibility of a slab avalanche forming. This means there is a low avalanche danger (level 1), despite or precisely because of the very loose snowpack. 'Stable snowpack' means 'not liable to trigger slab avalanches' and does not refer to the hardness of the layers.

This situation is not a good omen for the immediate future, given that as soon as it is snowed on, the fresh-fallen snow and fresh snowdrift result in the creation of a 'slab' where one did not exist before. Underneath this is the loose old snowpack in the form of a substantial weak layer. The avalanche danger will increase significantly, generally resulting in a long-lasting old-snow problem.

Small, easily triggered snowdrift accumulations

Fresh snowdrift accumulations can often be triggered by individual winter sports enthusiasts. The size of the snowdrift accumulations depends not only on the wind but also on the supply of fresh and old snow which can be transported. For only little snow which can be transported, the snowdrift accumulations are usually so small that getting buried by them is unlikely. In this case, level 2 (moderate) is often used despite the high probability of an avalanche release. In such situations the snowdrift accumulations can usually be seen in good visibility by the trained eye. They need to be avoided especially on terrain where there is a danger of falling.

Old-snow problem with a significant weak layer deep down in the snowpack

The more thickly a weak layer is covered, the more difficult it becomes for a fracture to form there. This is most likely to occur in locations where the snow is relatively shallow or in transitions from shallow to deep snow. In the case of an old-snow problem with a significant weak layer deep down in the snowpack, avalanche prone locations are usually relatively rare. However, avalanches often reach large size, and are therefore particularly dangerous for winter sports enthusiasts. Therefore, the avalanche danger in the case of an old snow problem can sometimes be considerable (level 3) even if the avalanche prone locations are fairly rare. An aggravating factor is that the avalanche prone locations are barely recognisable in old snow situations, even to the trained eye. In the case of weak old snow, more fatalities can be expected than in the case of the other avalanche problems (at the same danger level).

'Skier high'

If numerous large and, in many cases, very large-sized natural avalanches can be expected, the avalanche danger is classified as ‘high’ (level 4). In these circumstances, exposed objects (mostly sections of transportation routes, but also buildings in isolated cases) can be endangered. Alongside this classic ‘road high’ situation there is a further variant of this danger level when, even though very large avalanches are unlikely to occur, there are a lot of places where people can very easily trigger medium and large-sized avalanches. In many such cases, avalanches are released naturally as well. When this ‘skier high’ situation exists, those engaging in winter sports beyond the boundaries of marked and secured pistes are in acute danger. Transportation routes, in contrast, are either unaffected or affected only in isolated cases. When ‘skier high’ applies, the danger is usually described with the subdivision 4- or 4=; in the case of ‘road high’, any of the subdivisions can be used.

Avalanche activity in case of wet and gliding snow

Wet-snow avalanches are seldom triggered by people, and in the case of gliding avalanches this is virtually impossible. Therefore, natural triggering is the main cause of such avalanche types even in the when lower danger levels prevail. The maximum possible naturally triggered avalanche activity, based on the defined danger level, relates mainly to wet-snow and gliding-snow conditions and less to conditions involving dry avalanches. In this context large natural avalanches are possible when there is a moderate danger of wet-snow or gliding avalanches. In the case of a situation with dry-snow avalanches, such naturally triggered avalanche activity normally corresponds to a considerable avalanche danger, as then avalanches are also expected to be triggered by individuals.

The avalanche danger changes over time and may not reach or overshoot the boundary between one danger level and another within the period of validity of the avalanche bulletin. Ordinarily the danger increases, for example because snowfall or wind, significantly faster than it recedes again.

If the danger level is likely to change during the day, the level published in the avalanche bulletin and the danger description normally show the situation in the morning. The change (often an increase) is indicated in the danger description. Here are some examples:

• "The avalanche danger will increase and reach level 3 (considerable) in the afternoon." In this case, level 2 (moderate) is marked on the hazard map.
• "Danger level 4 (high) will be reached during the morning." In this case, level 4 (high) is marked on the hazard map.
• "As a consequence of daytime warming and solar radiation, wet-snow avalanches can be expected as the day progresses below approximately 2400 m." (With no danger level indicated)

If the avalanche danger is assessed to be level 4 (high) or even level 5 (very high) at night, and then one level lower during the day, the morning rule is deviated from. As when transport routes are endangered, the avalanche danger is also significant at night, the higher avalanche level that applies during the night is given in the evening edition. In the morning edition this is then reduced to the level applying in the morning.

Double map

In typical springtime conditions, the danger of wet-snow avalanches along with daytime warming and solar radiation will increase significantly as the day progresses. During the day the danger of dry-snow avalanches will usually only change slightly in these conditions. Thus, while in the morning dry-snow avalanches are the main danger, in the afternoon the main danger is posed by wet-snow avalanches. In this situation, two maps show both the more favourable morning situation (dry-snow avalanches) and the unfavourable situation in the afternoon (wet-snow avalanches as the day progresses). The transition from one map to another cannot be pinned down to a specific time. It depends on the conditions and the altitude and also in particular the aspect. Whereas on east-facing slopes the danger of wet-snow avalanches will already increase during the morning, this usually occurs only later on west-facing slopes.

In special cases a double map is also used if there is a significant danger of gliding avalanches, and this danger is greater, over a wide area, than the danger of dry slab avalanches. It is worth noting in this case that these two dangers do not vary significantly during the day. Therefore, the two avalanche types are possible throughout the day.

Marginal areas

There are no clearly defined boundaries between two regions with different danger assessments (e.g. different danger levels or different distributions of avalanche prone locations) but instead transitional areas which in many cases cannot be clearly assigned to either avalanche situation. This means that in a marginal area several kilometres wide, it can be assumed that either the more or the less favourite situation may apply.

Those undertaking backcountry ski or snowshoe hiking tours in such areas should therefore consult the avalanche bulletin for both regions in question.

Marginal areas

There are no clearly defined boundaries between two regions with different danger assessments (e.g. different danger levels or different distributions of avalanche prone locations) but instead transitional areas which in many cases cannot be clearly assigned to either avalanche situation. This means that in a marginal area several kilometres wide, it can be assumed that either the more or the less favourite situation may apply.

Those undertaking backcountry ski or snowshoe hiking tours in such areas should therefore consult the avalanche bulletin for both regions in question.